Book Review: Calling Bullshit: The Art of Skepticism in a Data-Driven World
I picked up Calling Bullshit: The Art of Skepticism in a Data-Driven World by Carl T. Bergstrom and Jevin D. West feeling a mix of curiosity and skepticism about the modern age of misinformation. In today’s world, where we’re bombarded with data at every turn, the need to sift through the noise for truth and clarity feels more pressing than ever. I wondered how these two academic authors would dissect the pervasive “bullshit” that surrounds us—both well-intentioned and otherwise—and whether they could equip me with tools to make sense of it all.
At its core, this book shines a light on the art of critical thinking in a society increasingly reliant on data. Bergstrom and West define “bullshit” as language and presentations that distract from the truth—think misleading statistics and flashy graphics intended to persuade rather than inform. While the title boldly proclaims the word “bullshit” 12 times in the preface alone, the authors quickly transition into a valuable analysis of how we can better interpret data. Their underlying theme is the idea of responsible skepticism: questioning the sources of information, identifying unfair comparisons, and being aware of our own biases.
The book walks us through various common pitfalls in interpreting data, and though some ideas may feel familiar, seeing them systematically laid out ties everything together nicely. The authors particularly nail the concept of misinterpretation as a danger unto itself—especially poignant given the real-time data debates that emerged during the Covid-19 pandemic.
One of the standout sections tackled the p-value—a statistical term often weaponized to support dubious conclusions. I found this section particularly illuminating; it provided clarity on how a failure to acknowledge a null hypothesis could lead us down the rabbit hole of misinformation. I could almost feel the lightbulb flicker above my head, a testament to their effective storytelling and simplified explanations.
Their practicality extends to solid advice for spotting bullshit: question the source, beware of unfair comparisons, and maintain a skeptical lens when something seems too good (or bad) to be true. Each tip hit home, and I appreciated their emphasis on thinking critically rather than merely rejecting bad information. In a world rife with soundbites, the authors advocate for careful consideration over knee-jerk reactions, something I found refreshing and necessary.
However, I did feel a tinge of disappointment regarding the book’s U.S.-centric viewpoint. As a global reader, I craved broader perspectives. Plus, I couldn’t help but think that some of the insights, while crucial, could be distilled into a more bite-sized format, like a podcast or even a TED Talk. The irony of questioning the length of the book while reading it—a bit “well-actually,” as I caught myself doing—was not lost on me.
Overall, I’d give Calling Bullshit a solid 3.5 stars (rounding down to 3 feels fair). The authors deliver an engaging guide brimming with useful insights on navigating the murky waters of information and misinformation. For anyone interested in developing a discerning eye when faced with data-driven claims, this book is certainly worth the read.
If you’re someone who enjoys dissecting information or wants to cultivate a more skeptical mindset in today’s increasingly chaotic media environment, you will find this book a timely ally. My experience with Calling Bullshit was not just educational; it spurred me to engage more deeply with the world around me, piquing my curiosity for future readings that dive even deeper into our data-driven interactions. After all, when it comes to the truth, it’s better to question than to accept blindly.
Discover more about Calling Bullshit: The Art of Skepticism in a Data-Drive… on GoodReads >>